We're in Your Corner(sm)

Legal news

News

Autos

[03/10] Harbin Electric Reports Record Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2009 Results
[03/10] Daimler trucks sees market turnaround in 2010

More...

Business

[03/10] Greek strike to shut down services Thursday
[03/10] Oligarch wins suit against Russian broadcaster

More...

Crime

[03/10] Calif. jury recommends death for serial killer
[03/10] Conviction vacated for Mass. man who ran over duck

More...

Immigration

[03/09] Calif. test-taking case shows gap in visa security
[03/09] Feds: Calif. man ran student visa fraud ring

More...

NHTSA Recalls

[03/00] HOLIDAY RAMBLER ( 10V084000 )
[03/00] DAIHATSU ( 10V083000 )

More...

Personal Injury

[03/10] Feds probe Toyota Prius crash in NYC suburb
[03/10] CDC uses shopper-card data to trace salmonella

More...

Product Liability

[03/10] Tainted ingredient sold after salmonella found
[03/10] Runaway Prius driver: Brakes were 'almost burned'

More...

White Collar Crime

[03/08] Tax season bringing out the fraud artists
[03/03] 10th guilty plea in Galleon insider trading case

More...

Case Summaries

Criminal Law & Procedure

[03/10] US v. Fisher
Defendant's firearm possession conviction is affirmed where police had probable cause to detain defendant because they were responding to a 911 call late at night, in a high crime area, with every reason to suspect gunplay, and the only vehicle at the scene looked as if it was about to depart.

More...

Ethics & Professional Responsibility

[03/05] Smith v. Mahoney
In a capital habeas matter, the denial of the petition is affirmed where: 1) although defense counsel inadequately investigated the facts of the case before allowing petitioner to plead guilty, petitioner did not establish that he was prejudiced by his lawyer's representation; 2) non-character, non-circumstance evidence need not factor into the constitutionality of a death sentence; and 3) petitioner failed to develop his claim of judicial bias sufficiently to warrant an evidentiary hearing.

More...

Family Law

[03/05] People v. Warwick
Conviction of defendant of child abuse and neglect and jury's true finding on the enhancement that she personally inflicted great bodily injury on her child is affirmed as, when she gave birth to her son in her bedroom and concealed the birth causing severe injuries, defendant inflicted great bodily injury on her child.

More...

Immigration Law

[03/10] Vila v. US Atty. Gen.
In a petition for review of the BIA's denial of petitioner's application for a waiver of inadmissibility, the petition is denied where, because petitioner's approved I-140 visa petition did not make him a lawful resident under section 212(h) when the Immigration and Naturalization Service formally approved his application for adjustment, petitioner did not lawfully reside continuously in the U.S. for the seven years preceding the initiation of his removal proceedings on October 25, 2003.

More...

Injury & Tort Law

[03/10] Cameron v. N.Y.
In an action for false arrest and malicious prosecution, judgment for defendant-officers is reversed where: 1) prosecutors' opinions as to probable cause and complaining officers' credibility are irrelevant in virtually all cases involving claims of malicious prosecution; and 2) the introduction of such evidence was not harmless because it provided strong external validation for propositions that otherwise would have come in only from the defendants' mouths.

More...

Workers' Comp

[03/05] Rhine v. Stevedoring Servs. of Am.
In a petition for review of a decision of the Benefits Review Board under 33 U.S.C. section 921(c) of the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, the petition is denied where: 1) a reasonable mind could have concluded that the Pacific Maritime Association Average adequately represented petitioner's annual earning capacity; and 2) the availability of alternative employment was determined by reference to two criteria: the claimant's physical abilities and the economic availability of particular jobs in the market.

More...

Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial use. Users may not download or reproduce a substantial portion of the AP material found on this web site. AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.

Visa and MasterCard Accepted • Payment Plans Available
Free Parking


No Attorney Fees Unless We Recover Compensation in Personal Injury, Workers’ Compensation, and Land Condemnation Matters


From our office in Raleigh, our lawyers represent clients throughout the entire United States. We offer telephone consultations, have video conferencing capabilities, and all of our offices are handicapped accessible. Our offices are conveniently located for clients in North Carolina, including but not limited to the Triangle (including Raleigh-Durham, Chapel Hill, Cary, Apex, and Holly Springs), and areas in and around Wilmington, Fayetteville and Cumberland.

Hablamos Español.
Wir sprechen Deutsch. Nous parlons Français.